Thursday, May 21, 2015

The Wife Bonus

[ed. See also: Poor Little Rich Women]

Women are notoriously bad at asking for bonuses. Which is why I did my homework and created – as BusinessInsider.com suggested – “a master plan”. I waited “the appropriate amount of time” (in my case, five years), made sure the big boss was in a good mood and took him out to lunch (“somewhere intimate, where there will be no interruptions”). I eschewed any usage of the word “need” (stinking, as it does, of desperation) in my pitch – which was “backed up with reports, charts and documentation of my positive performance” – and I tried to “remain respectful” as he stared slack-jawed back at me, before throwing his head back and roaring with laughter.

Asking my own husband for a bonus simply for being his wife was never going to be anything less than preposterous. Yet according to an author of the forthcoming memoir, Primates of Park Avenue, this is what a glittering tribe of crispy-haired Upper East Side Manhattan wives do every year – depending, of course, on how well they have managed the domestic budget, socialised, upheld a variety-filled performance in the bedroom… and succeeded in getting the kids into a ‘Big Ten’ school.

Wednesday Martin, a social researcher who has been immersing herself in the lives of “Park Lane Primates” for over a decade, explains how the “wife bonus”, as she has called it, works in practice.

“It might be hammered out in a pre-nup or post-nup, and distributed on the basis of not only how well her husband’s fund had done, but her own performance — the same way their husbands were rewarded at investment banks. In turn, these bonuses were a ticket to a modicum of financial independence and participation in a social sphere where you don’t just go to lunch, you buy a $10,000 table at the benefit luncheon a friend is hosting.”

So far, so laughable. Only Martin’s book isn’t a pastiche, but a serious, anthropomorphic study.

And it’s all true. I’ve lived on the Upper East Side – I know. I’ve watched this brittle brigade tirelessly work through their exhaustive body admin schedules and three Flywheel classes a day – not to mention the intensive labour that comes with being what Martin calls “the Glam SAHMs”, glamorous stay-at-home-moms. The mothers run their home lives as domestic CEOs, outsourcing and managing the nanny, the housekeeper, sleep trainer, thumb-sucking guru and child etiquette expert on her hands-free has become their full-time job.

“These women are anxious and hypervigilant about being perfect wives and mothers,” Martin tells me. “Whereas middle-class mothers are more likely to be working and come from a common-sense tradition when it comes to parenting, the more educated and privileged mothers tend to work from a script called ‘intensive motherhood’. While their husbands make millions, the privileged women who I met tend to give away the skills they honed in graduate school and their professions — organising galas, editing newsletters, running the library and bake sales — free of charge. It is also an act of extravagance, a brag: ‘I used to work. I can, but I don’t need to.’”

But under this arrangement, women are still dependent on their men. Add in the real stressers of intensive motherhood – exhaustively enriching their children’s lives by virtually every measure – and Martin believes it all combines to make these women feel frustrated, anxious, on edge…” And angry? “Yes,” she laughs, “very, very angry.”

by Celia Walden, The Telegraph |  Read more:
Image: Stepford Wives