A Radically Different Model of American Education

Since 2021, the stagnation surrounding American higher education has given way to the first inklings of dynamism with the efforts of the University of Austin (UATX) team to found and accredit a new liberal arts college “dedicated to the fearless pursuit of truth.” Like any start-up, UATX has faced detractors, dismissing the university as a pipe-dream, political pet project, or both. Nevertheless, those who question the feasibility of UAustin are sorely misinformed. A Political Economy Project talk on Monday, September 26 by the university’s Chief Academic Officer, Jacob Howland, made clear that UATX has already begun disrupting the American academy.

From its promotional materials and online presence, it is clear that the University of Austin tries to market itself as something altogether different from its competitors. After all, in a country with more than 5,000 institutions of higher education, it is imperative for a school to separate itself from the pack. Nevertheless, Howland clarified that the difference UATX attempts to offer its potential students is a fundamental one. The University of Austin does not seek to reform America’s traditional model of a university but rather upend it.

The changes Howland listed in his talk, entitled “Revitalizing American Higher Education: The Promise of the University of Austin,” are radical.

 

In place of large, on-campus administrative bureaucracies, UATX plans to make administration remote, outsourcing positions abroad. Not only will this arrangement save university funds, Howland noted, but it would also pay foreign workers livable, US-level wages. Further, the school will forgo—along with competitive varsity sports—what he called “club-med amenities”: climbing gyms, student recreation centers with ball pits and golf simulators, napping stations, private pools, and the like. UAustin has even rethought the principle of reserving classroom space for each academic department—at UATX, departments will have control over their budgets and bid for classrooms in a market. The money saved by this and other initiatives, Howland said, will go towards instruction.

UAustin has even rethought the principle of reserving classroom space for each academic department—at UATX, departments will have control over their budgets and bid for classrooms in a market. The money saved by this and other initiatives, Howland said, will go towards instruction.

Indeed, financial health seems to be a major focus of the entire UATX project, along with teaching quality. In Howland’s view, financial instability is a root cause of the decay in higher education. A lack of funds leads administrations to chase income over quality leading to the replacement of good professors with adjuncts. “Financially unstable universities inevitably erode academically,” Howland said. And yet, UATX’s vision includes no room for tenure. After all, the professor explained, 80% of large universities have or are considering Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion (DEI) requirements (read: affirmative action) for the coveted academic appointment. Such a system has led to increasing (leftist) ideological conformity amongst college faculties, with out-and-proud conservatives unlikely to receive tenure or even be hired at most institutions.

This status quo, Howland’s speech made clear, is antithetical to the values and mission of UATX. Far from trying to emulate its explicitly conservative counterparts in Hillsdale College and Liberty University, UATX seeks to be a “trans-political” space, where all ideological sides can be considered. Howland stated this principle succinctly: “Intellectual pluralism in place of sclerosis.” To make this a reality, the young institution will offer academics graduated term contracts with deliverables. The trade-up for no tenure, Howland said, would be the promise of low course loads and hard-to-find competitive salaries. Academic freedom in this tenure-less paradigm would be guaranteed by an external and independent committee that would adjudicate conflicts between faculty and the administration. (...)

In place of a major, UATX will offer juniors and seniors the opportunity to study in one of the university’s “Centers of Inquiry.” Described on the university website as “a combination of interdisciplinary research institutes, think tanks, and start-up incubators,” the centers will serve as homes for the creative, scholarly, or entrepreneurial culminating projects undertaken by each upperclassman. Announced centers include one for “Politics, Economics, and Applied History” and another for “Mathematics, Technology, and Engineering.” The point of the projects, Howland emphasized, is for students to connect with people and employ resources outside the university. Accomplishment is to be far less important than process.

by Lintaro P. Donovan, Dartmouth Review | Read more:
Image: The University of Austin’s logo. Courtesy of the University.
[ed. Yeah, good luck with that. See also: Have the Founders of the University of Austin Been in a Classroom Lately? (TNR).]