“I hope and trust that the authorities are on a path to doing what is necessary to restore confidence. Acting decisively and rapidly is both the cheapest for taxpayers and the best for the economy. Failure to act strongly enough would be a Lehman-like error,” Summers tweeted on Sunday.
Summers, a man who helped repeal the Glass-Steagall Act while Treasury Secretary under President Bill Clinton, also says any other banks should get help to protect the U.S. banking system more broadly.
“It is a clear imperative that all #SVB segregated assets and uninsured deposits be fully backed by Monday morning. Also imperative that sufficient support be provided to other banks to insure full availability of deposited funds across the banking system,” Summers tweeted.
Anticipating the reaction Summers would surely receive to such a strong call for government intervention to ensure that companies still had all their money, Summers tweeted that he didn’t want to hear any lectures about “moral hazards.”
“This is not the time for moral hazard lectures or for lesson administering or for alarm about the political consequences of ‘bailouts’,” Summers tweeted, putting “bailouts” in scare quotes despite the fact that he was proposing a bailout by the simplest definition possible. (...)
Oddly enough, Summers doesn’t believe the collapse of SVB is a “systemic risk,” which would seemingly contradict the argument that the bank needs an immediate bailout.
Summers also took a very different attitude when the people who might get a “bailout” where average Americans with college loan debt. Back in 2022, Summers tweeted against student loan relief, arguing that money for that relief would be better spent on allowing people who couldn’t afford to go to college a new opportunity to go to college—precisely the idea behind student loans to begin with.
by Matt Novak, Forbes | Read more:
Image: Chip Somodevilla/Getty
[ed. See also: Learning from Silicon Valley Bank's apologists (Pluralistic):]"Listen: people aren't pissed off about the bailout because they want startups to fail. They're pissed off because they are living in the century of "socialism for the rich and rugged individualism for the poor":
They're pissed off because the Treasury official who presided over the theft of millions of houses by corrupt, bailed-out banks after the 2008 Great Financial Crisis and then wrote academic articles defending the decision to "foam the runways" for the banks with everyday Americans' homes is about to join the Federal Reserve Board"
Also: Every Libertarian Becomes a Socialist The Moment The Free Market Screws Them (Current Affairs).